Friday, September 9, 2011

anonymous
anonymous - wikileaks - freedom - media
anonymous?
anonymous beginner's guide
anonymous 5-11-11
anonymous rules
anonymous message to nato
anonymous vs the fbi 1
anonymous vs the fbi 2
anonymous arrested
anonymous message to president obama
anonymous message to global media
anonymous message?
anonymous vs scientology
anonymous fail
anonymous to alex jones
anonymous to citizens of usa
anonymous to new world order
comment: it may be that, as they say, there is no single leader of 'anonymous' but rather there are many people who dig into corruption and injustice in organizations and one sends a message like this one to all interested hackers who believe something should be done who then start undermining the operation of the internet communications of that organization... a movement (or conspiracy, depending on perspective) does not need a leader, only a cause and people who believe in that cause...

anonymous spoof
anonymous spoof 2
anonymous something
anonymous declaration of independance
anonymous - explained
comments: @MyVeryBesttoYou wrote: it is extremely peculiar, but it works. What the majority approves, somehow, in this venue, turns out to have integrity. I don't know why democracy works better in this venue than in ones of the past. But it does seem to do. That is to say, I see people agreeing in cyberspace on rational grounds to good causes. But in real life, people agree for irrational reasons? on often poor causes. Weird.

and i responded: @MyVeryBesttoYou because in this venue it is one person one vote, one voice, one vote, the wave of voices rises and falls one by one... no democracy is set up that publicly with that much equality and transparency... no electoral college, no elected representatives who are bought by campaign funds and PACs, no news media owned by big corporations, just the people giving a thumbs up or down through actions...

No comments:

Post a Comment

been there, done that?... whatcha think?